joerookery
Well-known member
I was sent this helmet picture and thought I would give you my take on it. What are your thoughts?
You have a really really good one there. No wonder you could not solve it I think it is the only exact example of this that I have seen. I have seen several U markings and have been able to develop a theory but it is just that a theory.
What you seem to have is a newer helmet with an older visor. That was very normal as the Germans tended to be frugal and the BIA often did this. Given that, I believe you have two different dates and markings. The 1897 was probably the original issue date. The number fifty-five indicates the size of the helmet. The II was the original garniture mark
As the helmet aged it was downgraded to level III. You can see how that was scratched in. the number six that is to the left of the mark of III certainly looks like sixth company. The wear out date would have been around 1907.
Then we get to the new markings. Not only were helmets issued back into the system by the repair facilities with a BIA mark there are other marks used on release that cause confusion. The most common of these is the letter F. The letter is found on many BIA marks as well as BKA marks. it is found both in the capital letter F and the smaller letter f. This was an inspection mark that followed a shorthand wartime garniture system. Because many of the wartime helmets were released from the BIA with repairs this marking is often confused with "repaired". However, they were also inspected and released from the BKA. The letter in small or capital spelling means "felddienstbrauchbar" or field/war serviceable. The lower-level garniture inspection resulted in code "G" meaning "garnisonsdienstbrauchbar" or garrison / home serviceable only. This marking was often used for obsolete helmet types. This mark was far from universally used. As you as you will reallyThis was a wartime expedient. This replaced the garniture system with just two grades – either F or G.
I believe that the U is a third kind of garniture. I think it is lower still than G and used only for practice or rehearsals “Ubung”. This makes a lot of sense but unlike F and G it was not widely used. Only in a few regiments. The only really surprising thing is that it is stamped in rather than painted which gives the impression that it was done pretty early in the war.
I would like to post your example on my lists and articles. I have your full name so I can give you credit but I would like to use the pictures. I will also put them on the forum to get other opinions. As I was the one that developed the F and G analysis I think I am on pretty firm ground.
In addition I would like to get a photograph of the front visor that has Holeman marked on it – that also seems a little bit different. In addition, could I see a clear picture of the tag? This is probably the name and regimens of the individual who wore the helmet in the latter time. it would be interesting to know if that was before or after the visor was attached. Have you read this?http://www.pickelhauben.net/articles/DepotMarks_5_09.html


