poniatowski said:
I think you have to blame the 'Department of Homeland Defense'.
No Ron, I can blame the State Department for this, as it is the State Department that made the official statement that there were concerns over the guns being "old and potentially dangerous," and having concerns that "the guns could fall into the hands of terrorists and gangs."
The other issues are moot at this point, since the State Department (and through it the White House) are the ones that stepped up to block the importation.
My point has always been that the SD and WH could have done nothing, and then other issues would have kept the guns from coming home. I have been very diligent in following up on this issue, as I've reported on it as a journalist. So the bottom line is that the State Department, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton actually addressed the issue. They could have done nothing, but they still choose to address it.
As a columnist, where I can express my opinion, I personally feel they did so because it allows the SD and WH to say to the anti-gun crowd, "see we stopped these deadly things from coming in the country." The truth is that groups like the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence in August gave Obama an F rating, but a month later congratulated his efforts to block this importation.
Didn't hear about all that on CNN or MSNBC did you? But it still happened. So I am continuing to put the pieces together, and this is why at this point I say the blame falls on the State Department. They issued the statement, they told the South Koreas no, and they got the kudos from the anti-gun crowd. The buck stops with them on this one.
Just my two cents.
And thank you for your service. I appreciate what you did, and more Americans should say thank you.