A
Anonymous
Guest
As moderator of this forum, I have a few comments to make regarding the following posts:
Ugly, but original, and why so cheap?
A not bad copy - Look closely, though.
Given the provocative and acrimonious tenor of these comments (if not the lack of punctuation and coherency), I think we may take it for granted one author is responsible: new member, Gary.
Gary, welcome to the forum! Though I can appreciate these posts were motivated by a perceived slight against your reproduction helmets, I find it impossible to sympathize with your attitude. Given the consequences of your words, I am surprised you have not come forward to apologize to Otto and to thank Laurie for pleading your case most eloquently.
I have looked at your eBay auctions whereby items are described as “a high quality reproduction.” Clearly, there is no obvious attempt to deceive. However, you have also acknowledged your helmets are being sold by third parties as originals. In fact, you have insinuated derrittmeister, militaria-online, and Andy Beal have dealt your product (a shocking confession if true and libel if false).
For serious collectors, fakes and forgeries are a growing and persistent concern. Are you actually proud one of our members was nearly duped by your “prussian tin tschapkas?” You may consider this an occasion to “laugh out loud,” but I fail to see the humor. Since you followed that thread, you are also aware the helmet was returned for a refund. So much for that swindle.
Perhaps you would be willing to respond with a word or two regarding ethics and integrity. Evidently, you make no requirements of your customers and do not mark your product as “Reproduction” or “Copy.” Rest assured, the dishonest parties you sell to will harm your reputation more acutely than any criticism presented herein.
The purpose of pickelhaubes.com is to share knowledge and provide a forum for collector and historian alike. Some of our members have websites of their own, some are published authors. Rather than make enemies, you might participate constructively and learn a great deal.
Chas.
Ugly, but original, and why so cheap?
guest said:just to say i dont upload my photos i dont take pictures of every helmets as they are made all the same and would take a lot of time ,as for the quality my feedback says it all ,hope you all liked my prussian tin tschapkas you were on about ,people shouldnt call others without seeing things first some badges were good enough to be put on one of your members website :lol: :lol: :lol:
A not bad copy - Look closely, though.
guest said:you want to try looking on www.derrittmeister.com you may find you have put your foot in your mouth as it has 8 stars too oops ,except hes listed it as artillery i have bought of this gentleman they are very good and well made and he will go out of his way to help you ,i have originals only a few but the two i have bought do not look out of place against any of them
gsm7 said:this is my second post the other was for saying i pinch photos which i dont and use them to sell on ebay ,all i can say is all you can do is call everyone else and thats sad ,all my parts and skulls are hand made and are as close to the originals as i can as they are made from original parts ,the plates are not electro-formed they are hand pressed , i have loads of books for references and other on-line sources ,the only thing different if any is the cockades which are officers ,look here i cant see anything comical www.militaria-online.de ,i can sell these till the cows come home so its water of a ducks back, have a nice day :lol: :lol:
Given the provocative and acrimonious tenor of these comments (if not the lack of punctuation and coherency), I think we may take it for granted one author is responsible: new member, Gary.
Gary, welcome to the forum! Though I can appreciate these posts were motivated by a perceived slight against your reproduction helmets, I find it impossible to sympathize with your attitude. Given the consequences of your words, I am surprised you have not come forward to apologize to Otto and to thank Laurie for pleading your case most eloquently.
I have looked at your eBay auctions whereby items are described as “a high quality reproduction.” Clearly, there is no obvious attempt to deceive. However, you have also acknowledged your helmets are being sold by third parties as originals. In fact, you have insinuated derrittmeister, militaria-online, and Andy Beal have dealt your product (a shocking confession if true and libel if false).
For serious collectors, fakes and forgeries are a growing and persistent concern. Are you actually proud one of our members was nearly duped by your “prussian tin tschapkas?” You may consider this an occasion to “laugh out loud,” but I fail to see the humor. Since you followed that thread, you are also aware the helmet was returned for a refund. So much for that swindle.
Perhaps you would be willing to respond with a word or two regarding ethics and integrity. Evidently, you make no requirements of your customers and do not mark your product as “Reproduction” or “Copy.” Rest assured, the dishonest parties you sell to will harm your reputation more acutely than any criticism presented herein.
The purpose of pickelhaubes.com is to share knowledge and provide a forum for collector and historian alike. Some of our members have websites of their own, some are published authors. Rather than make enemies, you might participate constructively and learn a great deal.
Chas.