As Promised

kellerrat

New member
As promised here are some pics of parts of my collection. I think from the many replies to my introductory post that you all think I collect only battlefield relics. This isnt actually true, they are only a part of my collection, but it is a good place to start. And on pickelhaubes.com where better to start than with these pics?
I was considering putting this post in the haube discussion thread as there is no doubt that these helmets are original and not `messed` with.
Some of the features on these helmets which remember have been taken from a combat environment fly in the face of the regulations.

Heres the first pic..I must confess I look happy, but then who wouldnt?



This was taken some years ago in a large dugout on the Somme. The helmet was buried under about 5 feet of chalk roof fall. Fortunately it had become wedged between two large blocks, which had crushed and bent it out of shape, but which had also protected it. It is of course an 1895 pattern Prussian line infantry pickelhaube. At the time of finding, it was utterly complete. The strap and one of the cockardes were actually stored inside the helmet where they had been placed all those years ago. The helmet still has one of the hooks for the field grey cover rusted to the rear visor, and remains of the cloth were still attached to the spike.
The liner and the tie strap (leather) were utterly complete. I was amazed, but the chalk, being well drained, had obviously preserved it in perfect conditions of humidity etc.

Normally when I find leather equipment, I have a set routine I use for conserving and preserving it. Firstly I always seal it in a plastic bag, normally with a nappy wipe or 2 to keep it moist. When I get the item home, I soak it in a solution of surgical spirits with glycerine dissolved into it at about 20% The glycerine goes into the leather replacing the water and stopping shrinkage. The item is finished by giving it 2 or 3 baths of acetone. This according to the british museum removes excess glycerine and drives out any remaining water. I have used it for years on many items and it normally works.

Sadly in this case it didnt work so well. I opted out of the acetone bath as I thought it would probably destroy any of the original finish on the haube. The liner, despite all my best efforts fell apart, tho the tie survived. I still have the liner but it is in many pieces. I have thought about backing it with toilet tissue or model aircraft tissue and some diluted epoxy, but havnt tried it as yet.

Well..I live on a boat, so humidity is always an issue, even with de humidifiers. The helmet just kept weeping moisture (glycerine is hydroscopic i believe) and it just kept deteriorating. In the end I admited defeat and in order to save the helmet from total destruction, I bathed it in acetone, and treated it with an epoxy solution diluted down with cellulose thinners. I dabbed it on with a lint free rag over the outside of the helmet, and although this sounds extreme, it worked. It hardened up the shell which had become so floppy in parts it was like a wet flannel.

Its a real shame I had to do this, but as the following cleaned pics show, it did save the helmet. I still have a little work to do, the strap, which had been eaten by rats!! needs to be rejoined in the middle and the haube could use another good buffing. I didnt try and reshape the helm, it was found in this shape, its part of its history and I wanted to preserve that. I tried not to overclean the metal work also. Sadly the one cockarde that I found in the helmet was so weak, I had to paint the rear side with epoxy before trying to clean the front. This means its just to thick to fit under the strap, owing to the build up of rust on the rear.







Apologies for the poor pic quality. It will get better

Next up..sadly pics of me finding this one are locked on my old pc. This is a Hessen 1915 pattern haube



This was found in the same dugout as the Prussian haube, but a year or so earlier I think. This was actually under no more than 1 or 2 feet of chalk and was in the entry room. It was as you see it. It hasnt been reshaped (I never do that its part of the history) The liner was gone, there was just no trace of it remaining. However, as you can see from the pics, it had been abandoned with its field grey cover fully attached, all the hooks are still rusted to the visors. The spike was removed, but a 1915 pattern spike was found in very close proximity to the haube, so I can only assume this was the spike from the haube. At any rate I display them together, rightly or wrongly. It was complete with both cockardes still in place on the side posts. Once they were cleaned, it became apparent they were both the same!! I guess it was more important for the helmet to show the correct profile under its cover than to actually have the correct regulation cokardes? An interesting period and totally original modification that every modern collector would probably assume was a post war addition? Next time you find that totally untouched barn find with two reichs cockardes under the cover..dont pooh pooh it!!
There was no strap found with this haube although remains of an 1895 pattern strap were found in close proximity.

I treated this haube in exactly the same way as the 1895..surgical spirits and glycerine..it worked!! why? I have no idea. Thats all I did. I am midway between re stiching the rear visor at present. The front is finished. Other than that all I did was clean it, soak it and give it a bit of the old spit and polish.
I cleaned the wappen and the cockards with a very weak solution of oxalic acid, to remove as much surface rust from the paint as possible. It worked well, but unfortunately, the wappen simply fell off its locating hoops one night..living on a boat is not always romantic!. Being ferous, it was not very strong and it broke into several parts :x I still have 1 part to re-fix as you can see. In the end I opted to attach it using a water based glue, so that I can remove it when I find a better way. The wappen itself is also fixed together with toilet tissue and water based glue.

You can also see in the pic, several spikes and wappen, aswell as a set of chin scales and some other cockards. The Bavarian wappen on the left of the pic is a reserve one. It was found in a very small dugout, in the vosges. It was totally screwed up, as if someone had taken it and just rolled it up in thier hand. This wasnt normal damage, it was almost rolled up. The wappen on the right is Bavarian line issue and was found in a dugout on the St mihel salient.
Can you see the spike on the left, with the leather "jacket" ? 1895 pattern with the remains of its cover still attached. Same dugout as the hessen and prussian haube. There were no other remains with this..no wappen, no anything, which threw me a bit. In total I found the remains of 7 hauben in this dugout, over the space of 15 years, including a See battalion shako!. It was a huge headquarters dugout, and buried mostly beneath 5 to 8 feet of roof fall. Sadly, on my last visit I found the entrance had collapsed, completely sealing whatever remains behind tons of chalk. I am very happy I wasnt in there when it happened. A lesson well learnt. After so many years of visiting the same place I guess I was getting a little blase. I didnt treat it with the same respect I tend to give new holes.

Here are a few more pics. When I get time and if I havnt bored you all to death, I will take some close ups. I have many many chin strap parts, ranging from issue to top end private purchase quality. As a ref. source im guessing its very valuable.





The last pic is my doggie. My best friend for over 10 years. Sadly he passed away on oct 4th 2010 It still hurts. He was only an old lab/collie cross, but he was a real friend. This pic still breaks my heart.



Well I hope I havnt bored you all. I will try get some more pics up soon and alsoif anyone can suggest a better way of posting or hosting images without the adds!! please let me know.
Hope you all enjoy the post..any questions Im happy to answer.

Andy
 
Nice post Andy; thanks for sharing all your finds...
You might want to check Pierre de Grande Guerre's many nice posts here or the following: http://www.pickelhaubes.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=5805&hilit=+archeology" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
There's nothing better than Archeology; the feeling of finding artifacts is tremendous! There's no doubt in your mind they're the real deal no matter how little or big a value and even better yet, you're the first to handle them after their last owner!
I found many Roman and Phoenician artifacts (oil lamps, jars, etc.) in abandoned archeological search sites across Lebanon a few years ago and I still remember the adrenalin rush of discovering personal belongings untouched since antiquity!
Also glad to see you're a dog fan :thumb up:
And by the way, you slightly resemble Tzar Nicholas II (or his cousin King George V?) :D
 
Andy

Fascinating, thanks. Haube collecting the hard way! I'm particularly interested in what you do as I studied recently with Tony Pollard, who's done a lot of WW1 battlefield archaeology, including the recent programmes on Viper and the underground flamethrower. He also did the initial work on the graves at Fromelles.

I use Photobucket for posting photos. If you need it, there's a tutorial somewhere on the forum (written by Gus, I think), but I don't recall just now where it is. Perhaps somebody else can point you in the right direction?

Look forward to seeing more

cheers

Patrick
 
Thanks Patrick I will give photobucket a look over. I think imageshack would lose the adds if I actually upgraded to a premium account, is photobucket the same?

When you say you studied with Tony Pollard, are you refering to the course he heads in the centre for battlefield archaeology, or on a more personal level? I have looked at this course a few times, but although I am a graduate sadly its not in archaeology and I dont think I would qualify for it. Archaeology was my first choice from school all those years ago, but I simply didnt put the work in to get the required grades and have regreted it ever since. Its a course I would love to do, as most of my archaeological knowledge, if I can call it that, has been learned through a life long interest in the subject. I have a good few text books on techniques etc and have always documented what I find and where it was found etc.

I wouldnt say its what I do, I never go out with the intention of finding artifacts, but I just cant resist holes in the ground. That interest stretches to natural caves and disused mine workings aswell. I also have a large collection of stone age tools from around the world, some from ebay I must confess, but most just chance finds and often on the old battlefields. My normal weapon of choice is my camera, the spade only comes out if I find a promising dugout. French friends I have tell me Im just a very lucky man, but after 20 plus years of visiting any open hole I find on my travels, I just put it down to statistics.

Ron, that site!! the chap must have thought christmas came early!! Soo many camo helmets. I have only ever found 5 stahlhelms in all the years of visiting the battlefields. It looks like a water storage tank, I guess they all got thrown in there during battlefield clearance or something..unbelievable..thanks for the link.

Always been a dog person. I replaced Max with another lab/collie cross I called Bosun. I wouldnt trust him with a baseball cap on his head at the moment let alone a pickelhaube, he would eat it for sure. Hes still very young, full of beans and totally, totally lovable. I think I spoilt him to much as a pup. Bed time is a battle for space :lol:

Sadly I cant list the Tzar or George V in my family tree, or thier money come to that! Its the beard I guess..I work outside, so it dosnt get shaved between october to march time. By march I look more like the wild man of borneo than the tzar, but atleast my chin stays warm
 
Hi Andy

I did the M Litt course at Glasgow Uni with Tony and Iain Banks a couple of years ago. I had no background in archaeology at all- did a law degree back in the mists of time, and when I retired did an M Litt in War Studies at Glasgow, which led on to the Battlefield Archaeology. I have an A level in History, but I don't think that was crucial for either course. More a case of them believing you have the intellectual ability, interest and commitment. I can recommend the course -full of fascinating stuff, and a good mix of archaeology and history,but , unfortunately, you can't do it by distance learning/remotely, which I guess would be a problem, given your location. I live near Glasgow.

Anyway, keep it coming - just seen your chin strap fittings post.

I'm a dog man , too -see 'one for the dog lovers' on the 'social' site.

Cheers

Patrick
 
The distance learning may be a problem, although I would consider `upping sticks` and moving for the duration of the course. I`m just off to look at the dog post..so much of the forum I still need to get through.

All the best

Andy
 
Correction! Although I possess some items, I don't collect anything. The link to the interesting website with guys digging up loads of steel helmets in the Somme is not a link to my website!
As a foreigner I have to obey the French law, which forbids anyway foreigners but also French civilians to dig in the battlefields. On the roads to the battlefield of Verdun the police checks on a daily basis every car and its trunk leaving the battlefield. Foreigners risk the seizure of the finds and a very high penalty of several hundreds of Euros. Besides the French police guys can be nasty. Most "legal "collectors, I know, are French gyus, digging in their own fields in their own possesion. But you can still argue or have a discussion
about the morals of these diggers. For instance what do they do when they find human relics? In my experience a painful subject for many a private battlefield digger, covered with a thick silence.
On the other hand, Ron, it is very true, that I am interested in battlefield archeology and that I have visited 80 % of the interesting locations of the Western Front. The correct link to my website of Photo Impressions of the Western Front is: http://pierreswesternfront.punt.nl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; . Be welcome.
 
Hi Pierre,
I'm a big fan and frequent visitor of your site; it saves me the plane ticket(s)! (although I'm pretty sure seeing with your own eyes is much more exciting)
As for the cache with the camo helmets, I know you've got nothing to do with it.
I was actually referring Andy to your many posts on the Forum which are the closest to Military Archeology OR recommending the link pertaining to that (lucky) teenager who found the camo helmets...
And speaking of French gendarmes searching your stuff on the way out, you've reminded me of my visit to Paris Catacombes a few years back: There was virtually no one down there and no surveillance cameras so I thought anybody could take an old skull as a souvenir. I'm glad I had enough morals back then not to do it because we were thoroughly searched on the way out. Had there been pickelhaubes on the skulls, the story would've had a different ending I'm sure :wink:
 
Hi, Ron. Please , there is no misunderstanding concerning you being a fan of my website and a frequent visitor. I appreciate that and your loyal visits highly! :)
My remark here is just based on that I am afraid that I could be mixed-up by the link and the context to the other website with the mass of helmets findings.

I only want to get that straight that there is a difference between my way of visiting the sites of interest (leaving everything as it is) and the contrary, digging at will deep down underground or being active with an electronic metal detector, often on grounds without permission of the farmer / owner. Besides, France is my second fatherland, and I prefer to keep up my good reputation over there to continue legally my explorations in peace.

I am glad, Ron, that you confirm my severe image of the French Gendarmes from your own experience at the Paris Catacombes. So , you recognise that I really do not exaggerate.

In France many battlefields still contain the human remains of many soldiers of all belligerent parties. In consideration and respect to these victims, still scattered in and on the grounds, it is forbidden to dig. I have no problem at all to accept this kind of respect for the fallen soldiers, still hidden (often in pieces) in these woods and fields.

And I am stil asking. Did this guy also find any personal belongings like wallets, tobacco pouches, pipes, combs, with this collection of helmets? If so, where are the human remains belonging to the wallet, the tobacco pouch the pipe, the comb, the engraved cigarette case, etc?

Collecting in this way without any respect or scientific reasons, only to get rich for your collection and via Ebay, shakes my set of morals and values. In fact it makes my sick.

There is another side to illegal archeology, dear Ron, and I think it makes no harm at all to be aware of that too!
 
well I seem to have stirred something up here a little.

Firstly I would like to point people back to my very first post on this forum.

Please dont get me wrong..Im dont detect..I dont even own a detector. I know there is a very polarised view about picking up relics from the battlefield, but all of mine have come from an interest in walking the lines and seeing where things actually happened. 28 Years is a lot of ploughed fields. I also have an unhealthy (some might say) habit of diving down holes in the ground whenever I come across them, hence the name "keller rat" Yes its a strange habit and some might say dangerous, but I have learned and seen so many things in these little "time capsules" that just dont appear in contemporary writings and ref. books.

Pierre, I agree that there is a difference between your way of visiting the battlefields and mine. However I trust you are not linking me with this?

Did this guy also find any personal belongings like wallets, tobacco pouches, pipes, combs, with this collection of helmets? If so, where are the human remains belonging to the wallet, the tobacco pouch the pipe, the comb, the engraved cigarette case, etc?

In nearly 28 years of visiting the battlefields (without a detector) I have come across two bodies. Both were in ploughed fields and had been uncovered by the plough. I had no difficulty in reporting both of them to the authorities, and in both cases, my morals were never tempted by the prospect of a rusty helmet or some tarnished buttons.

One of these soldiers was a Canadian. He was identified and given a funeral with full military honors. I attended the funeral and had the pleasure of meeting two of his family. His sister had sadly died three years before I found his body. She had never given up hope that he would be found and visited France three times to look for him herself. No mean feat 90 years ago and on the wages of a seamstress! The family were so pleased to finally have closure and so sad that his sister didnt live to see the day. I still visit the grave once a year to place a poppy and send a picture to the family.

The second body is I believe, a German. I came across him in a ploughed field near Fricourt only a few weeks ago. I did my best to conceal the remains, took a gps lock and reported it to the authorities. I am still waiting for the outcome.

You are correct however. Sadly there are a great many "collectors" (grave robbers) who simply remove artifacts from the bodies of soldiers of all nations and kick the bones back in the hole. As you say, this makes me not only sick to the bones, but frankly b****y angry.

There are also, just as many "illegal" archaeologists as me, that actively help towards locating, identifying and burying the missing of the Great War. Soldiers that might otherwise remain lost well beyond their families living memories.

As far as
digging at will deep down underground
goes. Well I make no apology for that. I do what I feel I can justify morally to myself. I have never encountered human remains in a dugout. The soldiers lived in them, so its not likely they stored their dead comrades in the same place. In some cases a dugout may have been destroyed along with its occupants, but I have not come across one. At any rate, if it ever occurred, I would have no qualms about reporting it. Neither from a moral point of view or a legal one.

There are so many dugouts, open and accessible to anybody with a torch and the nerve to go into them, that "legal/professional" archaeologists will never have the time or resources to excavate them all. Especially as battlefield archaeology is only now getting a real toe hold in the Great War. I take the view that these artifacts are better documented and saved for posterity than being left to rot to nothing in the ground, whilst we wait for mainstream archaeology to get the funding it really deserves. Most of these dugouts can be found in communally owned forests and getting permission to excavate them is next to impossible as you simply cant find the owner!! I spent three months trying to find the owner of one particular dugout on the Somme, only to be told in a very quick meeting.."you can..it is nobodies, it is everybodies" Lovely and typical French logic :)

All my finds are documented and conserved in the best way I can. I may not be a qualified archaeologist, but I try to record and conserve items according to current methods. I honestly regard myself as the custodian of my collection. Be it items I have purchased, or items I have found. Both my sons understand that when I am gone, the collection is not to be split. In an ideal world I would like to open a museum, though that is not really likely in my lifetime. However I hope I have another 20 years of collecting and visiting the battlefields left in me and I imagine by that time the collection will represent a valuable ref. source combined with its notes and photographs.

I also want to say something about the legality of digging on the battlefields and the attitude of the gendarmes.

I am frankly befuddled by what you say about the French authorities. I have never, not ever, ever had my vehicle searched when visiting the Verdun battlefields. I go at least once every couple of years. I spent three days in a camper van with no front wheel, in the town center of Verdun, waiting for a new bearing for the stub axle. The Gendarmes were nothing but helpful. In all honesty, in all the years I have been visiting the battlefields, I have been stopped by the gendarmes only once whilst driving. It was a road block for drink drivers. They don`t do it by halves over there, they block the road and stop everything!! He laughed when he realised I didnt have a wheel on my side of the car :lol:

On one occasion I was called over to the road by a gendarme, whilst walking in a ploughed field. All he asked, was if I had found anything dangerous, meaning live. When I showed him my selection of rusty bits, he wished me good luck. On another, I was stopped by french customs at Calais. The customs officer had to move a spent French 75 and a couple of 18 pounder shrapnel cases to even get in the van. The final occasion I can remember was again at Calais, last year in fact, In the camper van yet again. A French customs officer picked up a relic butcher blade, and told me I was very lucky to make such a complete find. Perhaps I am just being lucky, but in all the years I have visited the Great War battlefields, in all the different countries it was fought, I have never encountered any difficulty from gendarmes or locals.

To finish, I`m afraid I must also disagree with your statement about the legality of digging on the battlefields. I dont dig (above ground) or detect, so I really dont care what the law says, but for the sake of correctness Im going to set the record straight. From what I am told by local collectors and friends, the law varies from department to department. On the Somme for example..digging is forbidden. However, sadly this is not to protect human remains from the Great War, as you say, it is to preserve Roman Archaeology!!. I`m not going to get into the political arguments about that one..it was mostly a British sector, but they want to preserve Roman archaeology. :???: In the Pas de calais however, both digging and detecting are allowed, with the owners consent. This leads to the utterly ridiculous situation of being able to dig/detect in a the top half of a field that has the department boundary running through it, but not in the bottom part (with or without the owners permission) In Belgium Im told detecting/digging is perfectly fine. Most of these as we know where predominantly British sectors. In Verdun..detecting/digging..its gonna get you locked up, fined or kicked out the country! Are we seeing a pattern here? Did I say I wasnt getting into politics [-(

Some say there is a carpet ban on removing any artifacts from any battlefield in France, but I have not been able to verify this, either through French friends, British friends living in France..or anything written anywhere. If anybody can provide me with a copy of the law that says this..I really will be very very grateful. It seems to be a common belief on forums, I cant verify it and I can only go with my own experiences.

If you want my honest feelings on the matter. I have no problem with people (including myself) walking the lines and picking up incidental finds. From personal experience, the authorities dont really care much about this anyway. Personally I dont agree with the use of a detector at all, or digging in areas where combat occurred.

I enjoy exploring dugouts, copper mines, pot holes etc etc. I make no apology for that. I take substantial risks doing this on occasions, but what I see and what I find are documented. I take great pleasure in exploring these places and conserving what I find. I dont do it for financial gain..I dont sell what I find. I love the fact that some of these places have never been visited since the wars end. What I am seeing is what Tommy, Fritz or Frenchy left behind when they walked away. What I find, what I remove, will at least be here long after I am dead and gone. Is that not better than lost history??

As you say there is a difference between your way of visiting the battlefields and mine, but please dont assume that all those that take artifacts from the battlefields are doing it for personal gain or to boost their collection! Some of us do it because thats the way that we choose to remember. You have your pictures..I have my artifacts..the sentiment is exactly the same. In the end..in the future..both will equally valuable.

As I said, there is a difference between how you visit the battlefields and how I do. But to simply assume that because I pick up relics I am some how less respectful than you is totally incorrect.

Andy
 
Andy, first I want to thank you for your extensive reply! I must say, your topic here, provoked some suspicions with me, and at the same time, realising that I could be wrong in YOUR case, Andy, the topic provoked a good opportunity to raise a discussion about the ethics of battlefield findings and the respect owed to the victims, the possessors of these belongings. A topic about which, I know from my own experience visiting all kinds of collectors along the Western Front, and a topic about which many collectors prefer to be silent. And maybe I should better not have opened my loud mouth here.

Anyway, Andy, you will see that we not disagree that much, and before I continue my reply, I lift my hat for your well considered arguments.

So , I was not thinking of you directly, Andy, but your topic provoked some thoughts with me.
Of course I support your not more than correct attitude to inform the authorities when you detect a body, not only from a legal point of view, but also from a moral point of view.

Personally I have no problem with detectors, Andy, if it is handled with care for possible explosives, but it is forbidden to use in France. That’s all.
I am happy that you also recognize “(grave robbers) who simply remove artefacts from the bodies of soldiers of all nations and kick the bones back in the hole.” More happier am I that you share your feelings of disgust with me about these robbers.

Considering entering dug-outs, there is also no problem for me. And as you have seen, Andy, I enter dug-outs more than often, perhaps not as deep and as inaccessible as the ones you enter. I must also say that I hardly ever found a relic in these bunkers. Sometimes in the woods you will find few until a lot of relics.

But even then, If everybody starts to take at will what lies before his feet, there is no contribution to the feeling of the next battlefield visitor. That is why I ask my visitors, who will follow later my traces (and a lot of my visitors do, I can assure you), to leave these artefacts -, most of the time not more than a rusty bucket, a pig-tail shaped barbed wire pole or a Pioniere spade,- at the same spot where they did find it. Let the other battlefield visitors have their part of the same experience. Be social instead of greedy!

Besides, as you very well know Andy, entering dug-outs need some good preparation. Topics like yours and also my website might cause people to follow our example and to do this un prepared with all risks, you can imagine. A reason for me to put two disclaimers and warnings about old and rusty explosives and entering tunnel systems unprepared on your own. We both should feel responsible with posting topics like this. Greedier collectors than you might follow your example taking greater risks to do this, not well prepared enough.

Am I am not an expert on French law, as you probably think to be, Andy; anyway, I know for sure it is not allowed by law to dig in the Somme, Verdun and the Vosges without special permission of the local authorities, the mayor of the commune. Only one exception; if you own the ground, you are allowed to dig as much as you like.
Your goal of digging is still expanding your collection, and there is no scientific goal whatsoever, whatever you might dream of your own “Andy” Helmet museum or not. My car has been stopped twice over the years for a search in our trunk, not in Verdun city (of course not!) , but on the road to and from the Verdun battlefield. It is your word against mine, Andy. In 2009 the customs searched my car in the Sundgau near the Swiss border, not for drugs but for battlefield relics, as they told me.( My French is perfect, better than my English)

When I am on the battlefield , I have indeed my pictures and I leave things where they were, and you , Andy, you are on the battlefield to expand your collection. That’s the difference. :)

Thank you, Andy, for your extensive reply.
Pierre
 
Hi Pierre. Yes it was a lengthy reply and it seems aimed at the wrong person. I just re read your initial post and see that it wasnt aimed directly at me. I apologise for any insult I may have caused.

Im still surprised that you have actually been searched for battlefield relics. Im sadly not an expert on French law, I only know what I have learned from French friends and from British friends who live in France. I do know that French law tends to be enforced more by the individual gendarme than by the letter of the law. Where one might hit you with the full weight of the law, another is just as likely to take you home to see his own collection. Despite all my best efforts, I have still not been able to confirm or deny the blanket ban on removing any artifact from the battlefields. Not even my French friends can confirm this. Some say yes, some say no.

Im sure you are aware of the growing (exploding) number of British visitors to the Somme. These days you take a drive down any of the roads that cut through the battlefields and you will undoubtedly see small groups of people walking the old lines through ploughed fields. The locals are obviously happy to have them there, spending money and many still beep their horn and wave if they see you field walking. There is also a huge market in France for these artifacts. They are sold openly by stalls in any militaria fairs you will find in France and village fetes. They are even sold by the museum in Albert and La targette, so I find the blanket ban hard to believe.

Personally I find selling battlefield artifacts more than a little ghoulish. As you rightly say, those relic helmets and even id discs cant all have been picked up in a ploughed field. This is why I never buy relics. I feel there should be more done to stop the sale of such things, but every time I go to France these days I see it more and more. It is simply exploiting the misery and suffering as far as Im concerned. Mind you Im a bit strange like that, I also think that bed and breakfast and battlefield tours are exploiting the same thing in their own way.

Like you, I tend to leave things where they are in woodland. Its part of the attraction for me to see the pickets and wire and rusting munitions in the places where they ended up all those years ago. Ploughed fields are not quite the same though. I wonder if you ever visited the battlefields around the St Mihiel salient? There was a section in those woods up until five or six years ago that was totally untouched. All the wire was there, the chevaux a frise,(spelling?) pickets, bunkers, dugouts and trenches complete with woodwork in some cases. You could walk the lines and see the redoubts. There were even trees with shell holes, shrapnel balls and bullet holes in them. It was a fantastic place to walk and I used to visit it often. Then one year we went back and the foresters had simply destroyed it :x They felled all the mature trees, even the war time ones and they bulldozed new access roads every fifteen feet or so. Now there is nothing to see..a preserved, untouched battlefield destroyed and gone, both front lines vandalised beyond recognition. Im not lying when I say I stood in the middle of all this carnage and wept.

Perhaps we will have to agree to disagree on the expanding the collection argument. I dont see it that way, but Im not going to convince you. I think as you say though that we actually share a great many attitudes beyond that.

Thanks for taking the time to reply (and to read my mega post :bravo: ) and Im all for a debate on the ethics of battlefield relics.

Andy
 
Andy, I do really respect your point of view and I will answer you tomorrow more extensively. In fact, re-reading this topic as a whole, I was triggered by Ron's remark mentioning my website, positively meant by him (!), in connection to a link of a rather questionable website, which I thought, is not yours.
For now I end with a translation of the French anti digging laws, the first one I could get, and I will be working on the original French version. This the version of a "forestier". Just to let you know, Andy, nothing more , nothing less. :) I wish you for now a good night.

The new French regulations conceirning digging/searching and picking up relics from French battlefields;

.....On our first search day (we had the intention to dig very carefully), we are deep in the forest when we got caught by a Forestier. A Forestier, is a French forester. Some Forestier has something more judicial powers then the foresters we are used to. Adorned with gun and handcuffs he told us the following:

1. The battlefields of France have been declared to historical sites of the French state;
2. All items in or on the battle fields is owned by the state;
3. Taking something / or picking up is the theft of the French state;

How futile, rusty or trivial picked up the article may be the law condemns it as theft of the French state for which the fines are strict.

However, if they have the impression it has to do with tourists with a purpose other than a 'souvenir' pick is also another law (eg in the Somme, Champagne, Verdun, Meuse and Argonne)

Have in possession:
1. a detector, or
2. spades, digging tools (a garden spade is too much), or
3. parts or components of ammunition;

Then immediate confiscation of their vehicle until the fine (FF 20,000 / € 3100, -) is payed. The French government is willing to containment of the offender (s) until this decision is respected.
Source: http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/search-technology-metal-detecting/laws-pertaining-metal-detecting-10209/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; .
 
I can not help it, and again not an original text but one from the French Wikipedia, concerning the laws about the use of metal detectors:
Pour ces raisons, l'utilisation de détecteurs de métaux est interdite dans toute la région Picardie (Somme, Aisne, Oise), dans la Meuse, en particulier à Verdun, dans quelques communes d'Île-de-France (autour de Mantes-la-Jolie), sur toutes les plages des débarquements de Normandie et de Provence, dans toute la région Basse-Normandie ainsi que dans quelques communes du Bas-Rhin et du Haut-Rhin.
In the mentioned regions or arrondissements, the metal detector is forbidden. Remark these are all regions belonging to the by law declared "Zone Rouge" ( 1919-1925), the former battlefield zone, which forbids digging and the use of metal detectors.
Source: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9tecteur_de_m%C3%A9taux#D.C3.A9tection_s.C3.A9curitaire" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; .
about the Zone Rouge: English , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_rouge_(First_World_War" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) .
French: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_rouge_(s%C3%A9quelles_de_guerre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)#Processus_continu .
Good night!
 
Pierre, if you mean you thought it was my website, no I have no website questionable or otherwise, though I am currently compiling notes and pictures towards writing a book about life in the trenches, based around the artifacts I have found over the years. I have two friends that have published books, so when (if) I ever finish it there is a route for me to have it published.

The regulations which you posted regarding the forestier refer to the protected battlefields of the French sectors, Verdun etc. You are right, the forestiers act like a police force in these areas, they are armed and have powers of arrest. They often go on horse back to patrol the areas. I have never had dealings with them, even though I have encountered them. This is because areas such as these have been designated as national memorials and I respect that. I visit these areas frequently, but only ever take pictures.

As I have already said, I dont posses a metal detector, nor do I agree with their use, however I have French friends and Belgium friends that do have detectors and know where they can and cant use them. One of the most commonly visited areas by these people is the pas de calais, where detecting is legal with the landowners permission. This was part of the zone rouge. At any rate I do not contest the legality or otherwise of metal detecting, as I dont use one. Nor do I contest laws regarding digging on the battlefields themselves. I dont dig in the trenches or the woods, there is little point without a detector anyway as it would be just guess work.

I do contest the blanket ban on removing any artifact from any battlefield for the reasons I have already given. In my experience, if such a law exists (and it is an if, as finding the original documentation seems to be extremely hard) it is certainly not applied..at least not in the areas that I visit. If such a law exists, then in areas like the Somme or Loos it is just not applied. If it was, the forums would be full of warnings from British tourists that would surely fall foul of it and for certain I would have been arrested or cautioned myself. I make no secret about walking the lines in these areas nor do I try to hide. In fact as I am writing, I remind myself of an event that occurred last winter in the fields opposite Poizier no.1 cemetary. My son and I were field walking when a Gendarme on one of those little scooter bikes they ride pulled over and actually started field walking himself.
If I am honest, I believe the blanket ban argument is a rumor circulated on some of the forums, by French collectors angered by the huge numbers of British tourists tramping across the battlefields these days. I will gladly accept this is not the case if someone can show me the legal documents that say otherwise, but I doubt it will change what I do. I have been field walking for 28 years after all. In my experience, if you respect the designated areas, keep off private land and dont run about the countryside waving a spade in the air, you will be left alone. Whether or not the blanket ban actually exists, it is certainly not applied.

To clarify, my interests do not lie soley in procuring items for my collection as you seem to think. If that were the case, I would be happily digging my way around France with a detector and spending large sums of money on questionable artifacts dug up by other people. I spend my hard earned cash on the same things that 90% of the forum members of this site spend their money. Pickelhaubes, Stahlhelms and anything related to Imperial Germany and its army.


My interests on the battlefields mainly lie underground. I enjoy walking the lines and seeing the trenches, but underground, this is where the soldiers of all sides lived for four long years. This is where I can see how they cooked, what they ate, what they drank, how they slept. I like to see how the dugouts were built, some are amazingly complete, even down to the field stoves and these were just as often looted from French homes as they were issued by the army. I have even seen a deep German dugout with a complete mobile field kitchen built into the wall. The wheels were removed obviously, but the axle stubs were still there. Where can you learn that the Germans did this sort of thing in a book? You must go and see these things for yourself to really know how these men existed for four years. We all know from contemporary writings that candles were used to light many dugouts, but where can you read that often tin cans were cut and opened to make reflectors, or that that by cutting off the bottom of a cartridge and using a bit of old blanket you can make an oil burning lamp? It is the human side that has always interested me. Where can you read that the Germans frequently cut down worn out jack boots to make slippers to wear in their dugouts, or that the military regulations regarding uniforms were certainly not always followed on the front lines. We have all read stories about helmets being used to cook food in, but to actually see the evidence of this..this is what drives my interest.

Of course I do not deny that I take great pleasure in conserving and displaying some of the artifacts I have found, but in truth they are secondary to the experience of seeing these places.

Andy
 
Andy, I am sorry for not replyingyet. My grandson is staying over and he has been consuming all my "computer time". So, now it is too late here to react, but I promise you again to answer your last contribution. This discussion is far too interesting, at least for the two of us, to continue.
I hope that tomorrow I will be severe enough to chase my grandson away from my keyboard. :) I hope that you will understand the reason for this delay.
 
Pierre..let your grandson play :D there is plenty of time for us to continue here. We dont seem to be starting much of a debate though. Does nobody else have anything to add?
Im not yet a grandfather (unless Im not being told something!) but I know that children take a lot of time. Its time well spent though.

Andy
 
Andy, thank you for your understanding and indeed it seems we are the only ones interested in this topic. On the other hand forums like these receive also many readers, who never post a message, so we will not know now.

I will start with disagreeing with you on one point, Andy, and I will finish with (more) points of agreement.

I think battlefield ethics is important, because over the years of travelling along the Western Front I have heard of and I have seen myself incidents, during which battlefield explorers and battlefield tourists were misbehaving and did not show any respect to the thousands of guys still buried in these grounds.There is difference between these two groups, especially concerning the knowledge of the past and the sites, but members of both groups can misbehave. I have seen for example German tourists picnicking on the Table of Sacrifice on a British War Cemetery, and visiting schoolboys alas of my own nationality throwing cola cans at each other at a German war cemetery.

There are a lot of diggers, grave robbers or not, who sell their findings in France from their “own museum” or for instance in a caravan, parked at the Lochnagar Crater, Somme. Sometimes these guys sell “restored” Pickelhaubes. I am not a collector with a bigger knowledge about helmets, than what I have learned over the year from all these guys here in this forum. But even I can see and I can understand that these helmets are most of the time fakes (the price of only 300 Euro’s for a Bavarian Pickelhaube, way too cheap for a real one, way too expensive for a fake one.). The existence of fake helmets and selling these as they were genuine helmets, is one of the reasons for existence of this forum.
Many of these fake helmets but also “illegally found”, genuine helmets, could have been found with corpses, without warning the authorities and they will later appear for sale at Ebay.

Let us settle first the legal argument, about the existence of the anti-digging laws. I am not a policeman, nor am I an always law abiding man. It is not my supposed higher set of values that gives me the right to attend you on this law. You are a grown man with your own responsibilities. So, what you do in France or not, is not my business, Andy.

But you give the readers here the impression that you can dig (without a metal detector) as much as you like in France and afterwards export your findings at home without breaking the law. This is really not the case.
As long as I am not able to produce the official text of this French law, you will unfortunately not accept, or you will not believe, that this law exists. Well I am not a Dutch lawyer, nor a French lawyer. This piece of law paper is not that easy to produce for a non-professional, non-legal person.

But on the other hand, did you read the complete book of laws of your own country Andy?! :D I bet you did not, like I have not read all our Dutch laws.
With all due respect, your argument of denying the existence of such a law made me think of an ostrich, sticking his head into the sand, denying there is real danger around him. Suppose you are speeding on the road. A police officer is halting you. Your answer would be: “Officer, I did not yet read the original text of the law on speeding, on my way I did not have seen the speed limit sign, so, there exists no legal speed limit law on this road.” We both know, Andy, that is not how it works in reality.

Even when I am not able to produce the right text of law, there is enough circumstantial evidence of the existence, like the detector laws, my own personal experiences (which you alas doubt, Andy, as if I am not reliable in this case), and many messages on internet, on all kinds of social networks ( even with photos of a search on Facebook), telling the experiences of many guys having the same experience as I did.

I also visit French forums, and also there you will find topics concerning the practical maintenance , or the practical implementation of this anti-digging law. That is not propaganda or a French hoax to keep out all the foreign diggers out of their fields, as you suggest, it is reality. I could have posts here many links, but I will not.

Until now you have beensimply lucky, Andy, not to get caught. And, as in all countries, and not only in France, officers can behave different in the same situation. One officer gives you ticket for speeding, the second gives a warning for speeding, and the third one is too lazy to work and he will not stop you or he will look the other way. This phenomenon happens everywhere, at least in Europe.

I know of farmers in Belgium and France that they hate those tourist walking without permission over their fields. Tourists do this often, even when the crops start to grow. These farmers make no extra money from these tourists, but only get the damage of these “walks over the battlefield searching for some shrapnel balls”.
Even these few farmers, who sell their ploughed up surplus artefacts from their own museum, hate those tourists, because they “are robbing them of their stock” and of a possible interesting addition to their own collection.
For now I have said enough about this “legal argument” , Andy.

We do agree, or rather share the same viewpoints, on our battlefield experience. Even when those guilty landscapes have changed now from muddy battlefields into richly vegetated hills, it is hard to explain to an outsider the feeling you get when walking on these former bloody locations, or entering a bunker and a dug-out. I am not paranormal and I do not believe in ghosts. But I have this feeling on every special historic location, also on other ones than the WW1 sites. It makes you feel directly related to the past, and often it makes me daydream on the spot about the gruesome events that happened; about the little man of no significance or of any importance fighting in the middle of a battle, having lived in this underground room. That is why I prefer to go on my own with my wife and dog and not to travel in groups.

I was already aware that you don’t use a metal detector Andy. That’s okay. I am entering bunkers as you do and also without a detector. A Detector is also not necessary for the kind of explorations I do and it would be useless.

One of my( younger and fitter) friends is going deeper into large tunnel complexes than I do (for health reasons). But my younger friend is always very well prepared with old maps, using the right ”abseil” and mountain tools, good torches and a construction helmet. His purpose is measuring the dug-outs in their last state, comparing it with deviations of the older maps of before 1918. He takes a lot of photos and afterwards he leaves everything as it was before. No harm done to an “archeological site” or what so-ever. Lats year he spent a day under the Tete de Faux, while I was walking in the sun on top of the same mountain, enjoying other bunkers. So , I have no problem with you entering bunkers, Andy, although, as we both do very well know, often these bunkers have a sign “Entrée interdit”.

I am so glad that you share my opinion to leave the rusty Friesian Horses, the barbed wire, the buckets, etc. on the battlefield, at least to share this experience for the next battlefield explorer.
I am also aware of the fact that is also the French authorities, who do more damage to the relics of the Western Front than most tourists or explorers do.

I do agree, Andy, here also and I do recognize your experience at St. Mihiel! For example in the Vosges at the Lac Noir the French authorities blew up a large French divisional command post. I am lucky to have photographed this bunker before the demolition. In June 2010 I did find on this spot an empty place and only a sign, announcing this demolition! (See for the photo’s of this bunker: http://pierreswesternfront.punt.nl/?id=416254&r=1&tbl_archief=&" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ) This bunker does not exist anymore. I am still a bit angry about this unnecessary loss. The French state could have served a better example for its citizens and its visitors than this example of historical destruction.

So, let us together, in respect of our differences of opinion, Andy, set up some guidelines how to behave well on the battlefield and how not, just out of respect for all these guys still buried there and out of respect for the next battlefield visitor. Based on our mutual understanding and agreements we should come to a concise list of do’s and don’ts.

We share the same passion, Andy, and we seem to differ only on one or two rather small subjects. But in the mean time we had a good discussion about battlefield ethics , and what to do and what not to do, collecting helmets on the battlefield and perhaps afterwards selling these on Ebay.

Pierre
 
Back
Top