From our series "It's not always as written in books", here is a puzzling find. I think I showed it a long time ago but I made new pictures and I would like to submit it to the sagacity of more recent members:


On the left side of the rear visor is written JR74 and a name: Heine:

On the right: RJR74 2B

Inside the Uberzug one reads JR74, RJR74 2B and Heine:

So far no problem. The surprise comes when you take the Uberzug off. The front plate is from Oldenburg, and the state cockade from Prussia:

Knowing the history of the helmet, kept in a family since WW1 till I found it, it is virtually impossible that the eagle was changed.


So what do we have here? Part of the reserve of OJR91 was indeed with RJR74 but, according to Larcade, in the first battalion. Was Larcade partly wrong? And if this was the case, would a soldier be allowed to keep his Oldenburg plate in RJR74 (Joe? Jim?..)?.. (and without a reserve cross).
Any suggestion welcome...


On the left side of the rear visor is written JR74 and a name: Heine:

On the right: RJR74 2B

Inside the Uberzug one reads JR74, RJR74 2B and Heine:

So far no problem. The surprise comes when you take the Uberzug off. The front plate is from Oldenburg, and the state cockade from Prussia:

Knowing the history of the helmet, kept in a family since WW1 till I found it, it is virtually impossible that the eagle was changed.


So what do we have here? Part of the reserve of OJR91 was indeed with RJR74 but, according to Larcade, in the first battalion. Was Larcade partly wrong? And if this was the case, would a soldier be allowed to keep his Oldenburg plate in RJR74 (Joe? Jim?..)?.. (and without a reserve cross).
Any suggestion welcome...