Bruno
Not really, Steve, but I like photography in general. When a nice WW1 related one comes into sight I may try not to miss it.I did not know that you were also a collector of photos
Yes, a photo that proves that when war broke out, anything was possible to equip the soldier: M94 chinstrap for parade (with scales), chinstrap with leather strap, in natural leather (brown) or patent leather (black). Note the difference in strap length, due to the different spacing of the sliders.Very interesting picture - some Tschapkas have chinscales, others do not.
Cheers
And some of the chinscales look too short, that is, sitting too high on the eagle plate. Seeing the same on a Tschapka nowadays, many a collector (including myself) would conclude that the chinscales are not original to that helmet...Yes, a photo that proves that when war broke out, anything was possible to equip the soldier: M94 chinstrap for parade (with scales), chinstrap with leather strap, in natural leather (brown) or patent leather (black). Note the difference in strap length, due to the different spacing of the sliders.
Right. And on some of them the guard eagle is missing the Suum Cuique star. Does it mean those are M15 models? I have never seen a brass eagle missing the star on a Tschapka.Very interesting picture - some Tschapkas have chinscales, others do not.
Cheers
All very interesting pointsRight. And on some of them the guard eagle is missing the Suum Cuique star. Does it mean those are M15 models? I have never seen a brass eagle missing the star on a Tschapka.
Exactly.y) In fact, the length of the scaled part depended on the size 1-2-3 of the hulls. So that, in the resting position (with the fastening button), it's positioned just under the faceplate, roughly under the separation with the visor.And some of the chinscales look too short, that is, sitting too high on the eagle plate. Seeing the same on a Tschapka nowadays, many a collector (including myself) would conclude that the chinscales are not original to that helmet...