16thIrishDivision
New member
What do you make of this Haube?
https://www.weitze.net/detail/20/Th...rie_Regiment_Nr_95_Gotha_um_1910__193420.html
https://www.weitze.net/detail/20/Th...rie_Regiment_Nr_95_Gotha_um_1910__193420.html
weirdpyramid said:I would skip these types of helmets unless it has the proper regt stamps. They are too easy to upgrade from a regular line infantry helmet.
I agree. With these scarcer EM helmets, the markings just have to support the plate. That said, this appears to be a private-purchase helmet (judging from the lining), so it would have to be examined in hand with the plate off...
joerookery said:I agree. With these scarcer EM helmets, the markings just have to support the plate. That said, this appears to be a private-purchase helmet (judging from the lining), so it would have to be examined in hand with the plate off...
Amen
poniatowski said:joerookery said:I agree. With these scarcer EM helmets, the markings just have to support the plate. That said, this appears to be a private-purchase helmet (judging from the lining), so it would have to be examined in hand with the plate off...
Amen
Hamberg is a beautiful city...
Ron
Gentlemen, I have to disagree a little bit... Just look at the motto of the bandeau... A normal Prussian EM helmet has the "Mit Gott fur Konig und Vaterland" bandeau, this one has "Mit Gott fur Fuerst und Vaterland" bandeau, which is correct for this helmet...I would skip these types of helmets unless it has the proper regt stamps. They are too easy to upgrade from a regular line infantry helmet.
Adler said:A normal Prussian EM helmet has the "Mit Gott fur Konig und Vaterland" bandeau, this one has "Mit Gott fur Fuerst und Vaterland" bandeau, which is correct for this helmet...
Adler said:This helmet seems to be original, but it appears to be cleaned up. The metal parts are to brightand the leather of the outside looks to well preserved, compared with the leather of the inside... kokarden seem indeed replacements...
Adler
weirdpyramid said:Line infantry eagles fit line infantry helmet holes, right?
It's a private purchase helmet, they normally don't have regt. stamps... Also the private purchase helmets were made by different makers; it would be remarkable if the plates of different makers and with different helmet sizes would be interchangable...without proper regt stamps i just cant believe in these helmets 100%
argonne said:weirdpyramid said:Line infantry eagles fit line infantry helmet holes, right?
It would be like a big "Loto-Gewinn" if it would be like this. Because of different helmet sizes and the lot of helmet manufacturers, it´s almost impossible to make this a rule...really.
Just try that " puzzle game" on your own helmets and you will soon see that´s not matching... :-?
Philippe
Adler said:It's a private purchase helmet, they normally don't have regt. stamps... Also the private purchase helmets were made by different makers; it would be remarkable if the plates of different makers and with different helmet sizes would be interchangable...
Q. Are the front holes on all Prussian Helmets the same distance apart? For instance if I got a junk Prussian line shell how hard is it to affix lets say an Oldenburg plate to it?
A. No not all holes are the same (one size does not fit all) however, it might match or you could punch additional holes-() but in order to pull it off there would have to be no markings in the helmet ie. Regt and Army Corps. No collector worth his salt would buy it without checking these out first. Eventually it will have to be sold down the line. You are better to get a shell that has the correct markings and then look for a plate that is correct. You should not change these helmets but repair them to their correct form for posterity. Many OR shells had depot marks. Sometimes multiple ones. If you are going to collect enlisted helmets you absolutely must understand these marks, and how to read them. Officer helmets seem to have been seldom marked by unit.
The holes on Prussian helmets are not the same distance due to the different manufacturers and the different sizes of helmets being made. Some M15 plates are smaller ie. a shorter distance between crown and tail probably to save metal. Older wappen are taller because the crown of the helmet was higher at the front than the M95 and M15 helmets. All of these factors influence the spacing of the grommets and the loops on the back. There are two spacing theories: 1. what they did was go by size of helmet. For instance, certain wappen would probably would fit sizes 54 to 56cm. 2. Each wappen maker had their own distance. I side with theory #2 however, this is a theory that might well be wrong. Do not think that any plate will fit any helmet. One size does not fit all. Julius Jensen apparently made helmets for both XIV and XV Corps so you could find Baden and Prussians with the same distanced grommets.
I actually saw a collector buy a scrap Uhlan helmet and a scrap M15 eagle and they matched first time! A helmet was restored at a fraction of the price. I would never have that kind of luck.
weirdpyramid said:But we all know that these 115th EM helmets were made by one manufacturer, Martin Mayer, so maybe not so impressive.
I totally agree. In this case, I would 100% trust such a helmet with original holes and original soldered loops/screw posts. But I would rather spend more money and buy one with regimental markings. It´s only a matter of preference, how you want to collect and how much you want to spend.Adler said:It's a private purchase helmet, they normally don't have regt. stamps... Also the private purchase helmets were made by different makers; it would be remarkable if the plates of different makers and with different helmet sizes would be interchangable...
I don´t think so.weirdpyramid said:I was talking about the Oldenburg helmet. Surely this could have been a unmarked regular line infantry helmet at some point, right?