what am i missing about this

gino1

Active member
here are some pictures, should the weapon not be a silver one or.....do I see something that you do see?
would like your opinion
 

Attachments

  • duits1.png
    duits1.png
    388 KB · Views: 26
  • duits8.jpg
    duits8.jpg
    183.8 KB · Views: 26
  • duits7.jpg
    duits7.jpg
    172.6 KB · Views: 27
  • duits6.png
    duits6.png
    160.4 KB · Views: 26
  • duits5.png
    duits5.png
    372.3 KB · Views: 26
  • duits4.png
    duits4.png
    268.8 KB · Views: 27
  • duits3.png
    duits3.png
    272 KB · Views: 25
  • duits2.png
    duits2.png
    241.5 KB · Views: 27
Brass fittings are the most common, especially for the headgear of foot hunters.
Nickel silver fittings are rarer, as they are used by small technical units (telegraph operators, drivers, aviators, etc.).
This is a privately purchased Shako (Extra-Helm Eigentum) for a one-year contract. It has no side vent, and shows a bourdalou (leather strip at the bottom of the hull). The eagle has screw-nut fastenings. The large central button side-post should be M91 with a single anti-rotation latch at the rear.
The inner lining is of the “officer” type, after about 1885. The silk bottom is missing.
 
As far as I know, that Prussian kokarde should not be there, as the Feldzeichen already shows which state the Shako is from.
For the rest I agree with the comments above mine.
 
More or less, yes.
You can't tell if the feldzeichen (or the chinstrap,....) came with the helmet for sure....and what about the prussian cocarde; ...did the original owner wear it against regulations or was it added by a previous owner, not aware it shouldn't be there...
Lets say; it is a nice complete shako.
 
After your decision I bought the Tschako although I still have 80% doubts, here are some pictures of the parts I removed
thanks to everyone for their contribution, although the holes in the conkardes are on the large side
yet I continue to doubt the beauty of the shako, not a scratch or anything
 

Attachments

  • c819190a-41aa-4987-9055-40237b31ea89.jpg
    c819190a-41aa-4987-9055-40237b31ea89.jpg
    234.3 KB · Views: 8
  • bf83c797-60ea-40fc-b125-a73bb924c6e6.jpg
    bf83c797-60ea-40fc-b125-a73bb924c6e6.jpg
    252.8 KB · Views: 8
  • b3dcce81-1a5a-41dd-8e22-043d4a847f7b.jpg
    b3dcce81-1a5a-41dd-8e22-043d4a847f7b.jpg
    294.8 KB · Views: 9
  • 407c65b3-d3a4-4e55-8eee-fd1154af4a3f.jpg
    407c65b3-d3a4-4e55-8eee-fd1154af4a3f.jpg
    184.3 KB · Views: 9
  • 31cacf0f-06f4-43ad-bb0a-e73ecc62d945.jpg
    31cacf0f-06f4-43ad-bb0a-e73ecc62d945.jpg
    369.7 KB · Views: 9
  • 5bc1a795-250c-4166-8328-41e402e6f95e.jpg
    5bc1a795-250c-4166-8328-41e402e6f95e.jpg
    195.3 KB · Views: 9
  • 4a07ef9f-0c9f-4330-adc4-ca74bed43e5a.jpg
    4a07ef9f-0c9f-4330-adc4-ca74bed43e5a.jpg
    188.5 KB · Views: 9
  • 0f80e6b9-c4e2-40c6-8738-9d6eec26c858.jpg
    0f80e6b9-c4e2-40c6-8738-9d6eec26c858.jpg
    202 KB · Views: 9
  • 0b3936ea-77b7-42dc-83a6-ac07f3690825.jpg
    0b3936ea-77b7-42dc-83a6-ac07f3690825.jpg
    205.6 KB · Views: 8
  • 61d88625-f9a2-4bf5-bef3-fadfe0572aed.jpg
    61d88625-f9a2-4bf5-bef3-fadfe0572aed.jpg
    151.3 KB · Views: 8
  • a6e29cd3-4135-44aa-a9f1-a2ce4701502a.jpg
    a6e29cd3-4135-44aa-a9f1-a2ce4701502a.jpg
    190.8 KB · Views: 5
  • e77a9a16-db1c-4901-b382-e80ee66ba07d.jpg
    e77a9a16-db1c-4901-b382-e80ee66ba07d.jpg
    100.7 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Everything looks fine to me. Private purchase quality is much better than issue quality. As mentioned, I would remove the national kokarde per regulation; it has paint touch up anyway. The front wappen holes in the body MAY have originally had grommets. I could be convinced either way?
 
Back
Top