joerookery
Well-known member
I thought that helmet looked interesting too! Very large cross. All of the gilt color. Do you think this is thick patina? I can't wait to hear your thoughts and see pics.
I will send more pictures if worth it.
Lacarde made these claims and I have no reason to think he was wrong but HOW did he figure it out? I understand that you can trace a Landwehr unit to the Bizirk HQ but a reserve unit???? How do you do it? What reference? Hoe do we know which minor state reserve unit used what wappen?it has the correct R32 marking (one of the reserve regiments for IR94
Hi Bruno:911car said:JR95, which had the same front plate as JR94.
While we wait for Bruno's pictures, I thought I would look at this statement. Ruhl does just that lumping all of the Saxon duchies into one big group.This is what I thought Chas but looking at other sources I found the IR95 plate to be the same...
I am sure that Lacarde is right. He has an amazing amount of specificity. However, his bibliography stinks. A listing of 18 general sources, including the entire Zeitschrift für Heerskunde does not narrow it down for researchers. I feel like a scientist trying to re-create St. Elmo's fire. I know it existed, but I cannot re-create how it was done.Larcade's bibliography is listed at the end of his books. Of course I did not re-check everything but I never found a mistake in what he wrote regarding affiliations.
You will see several markings: 1B. RJR71 on the rear flap and Rohner 1./71 hand-written inside the shell. Then R32. and Tarcher in large characters on the rear visor and inside the shell. For this reason I suppose the most recent owner was Tarcher. After re-checking I now agree with you and Chas. This helmet was probably first affected to 1B. RJR71 (Rohner, reserve of JR95), then to R32 (Tarcher, reserve of JR94). The front emblem is indeed typical of Saxe-Weimar, with the different leaves. After all, all they had to do to switch from 95 to 94 was changing the small oval emblem, which probably explains that there is no trace on the shell that another plate was ever affixed on this helmet (and I looked closely). The Saxe-Weimar emblem and reserve cross are both made of white metal. It is not the first time I see a large, older model plated affixed on a 1895 reserve helmet. In fact I have another one, from a reserve prussian regiment, with a plate of the same model and size, attached with threads.
Interesting helmet. I have not decided yet whether I will leave it as it is or go through a light cleaning. The gilt on the eagle seems to still be in very good condition.
Why do these parts look so yellow if they are white metal? I have a similar question on a Saxon cockiade. How do you tell?The Saxe-Weimar emblem and reserve cross are both made of white metal.
Why do these parts look so yellow if they are white metal? I have a similar question on a Saxon cockiade. How do you tell?
Given the configuration, it makes sense to utilize a taller profile eagle to position the IR 94 Wappen and large Reserve Kreuz without extreme overlapping. However, it is mind bending to contemplate the number of conversions this bird has undergone (1871 to 1895; IR 95 Reserve to IR 94 Reserve).Tony & Kaiser said:That appears to be an M1871 Reserve eagle, but it has had the posts removed, M1895 loops added, and the star Wappen placed over the EK indent on the chest.
1. Depending on the alloy, German silver sometimes turns "yelowish" as it ozidizes. With a little proper cleaning the wappen & cross will most likely come back to a white color. 2. Some white metal helmet parts, usually lesser quality private putrchase items, were stamped brass that was then very lightly plated. If plated parts of this type have been cleaned with an abrasive cleaner like Brasso at some point in time the cleaner strips the plating leaving just the brass.
I don't have a problem with it just want to know how large is in this case. I think >30mm.there is some precedent for larger Reserve Kreuzen on Mannschaften helmets