joerookery
Well-known member







Spiker said:This is the first time that I see this wappen where the bandeau does not run thru behind the eagles tail. :-k
Do you think the chinscales are original to this helmet? They seem to be too long or are they just sitting to high?
This is the first time that I see this wappen where the bandeau does not run thru behind the eagles tail. :-k
Wrong again! Kaiserin [-X PasewalkWasn't this KP Wilhelm's regiment? ... or am I mistaken AGAIN?
Yes but what a horrible blurry picture!The makings on the shell though, are perfect.
While this brings up some great points and we need to take more pictures I'm afraid the dexterity to remove the Eagle is now beyond me. We will have to wait until someone comes down here to do that. This has to be a separate production run – the cross is inset. So this is not at all the same Wappen as the active guys. Unfortunately, with all of the pictures I have of these guys they almost all have helmet covers. Drat.Are the tail feathers straight as is correct for a Kurassier eagle? Is the bandeau stamped? Could we see some photos of the back of the eable and bandeau?
joerookery said:Do you think the chinscales are original to this helmet? They seem to be too long or are they just sitting to high?
I think they are they were sitting very high as they had to be removed to get a picture of the marking. Probably not put down enough. What really surprised me though was a difference in patina color between the scales and the connector. Almost looks like the scales are older and were used again for this one.
, for metal helmets this usually means the spike was married before to another helmet.
bandeau does not run thru behind the eagles tail