RON said:This one can't be the real deal can it? :-?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-IDed-2-M-G-K-46-WW1-GERMAN-M-16-CAMO-HELMET-w-LINER-CHINSTRAP-/180812245682" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
ebeeby said:Ron - Just received Haselgrove's "Helmets of the First World War" today. A stunning book with *great* photos. He includes many many examples of stahlhelm camo.
It's not that the colors can't be bright - they can, or the black lines wide (or pencil diameter narrow) they can. I guess it is the overall take on the helmet that sometimes is off-putting. IF your radar goes ding just pass. If you buy it, you will always be hearing that "ding". So when you see one that doesn't ding your radar - go for it.
I'd ship you this new book to look through except the seller spent $16 shipping it to me - a large book!
Eric
kellerrat said:Looks that way Jerry :x 4***e is in for a lot of money on almost every item from early swords to to the dodgy jap helmet.
Why do they call it shill bidding btw? Where does the term come from.
Andy
I just cant see that myself, with heavy crown wear on the camo paint and all those chips, I would expect to see at least similar damage to the field grey underneath, and it dosnt look that way. Even if you put the crown wear and the chipping down to period damage, how did the camo paint survive almost intact on high wear points like the edge of the brow the stirnpanzer lugs and the rivots?a helmet that had been keep in a footlocker or at least out of damaging light, dust, tobacco smoke etc for all these years
You cant go wrongIF your radar goes ding just pass. If you buy it, you will always be hearing that "ding". So when you see one that doesn't ding your radar - go for it.