RON said:Since this is a post 1915 helmet, shouldn't the chinscales be of the M15 style (detachable with faux rosettes and 3 rivets)?
pppara said:the FAR 25 rgt was awarded the star of the ludwig order on 1915....so only the star was added
pppara said:the stars of the spike are only a fantasy of some officers. They are in no way regulatory.
So the helmet shown in this topic is perfect and regulatory....
Khukri said:Some reference stuff:
Offz from then on wear the four gold plated Offz stars on the base plate of the Kugelspitze*"
(*Can be seen in "Spiked Helmets of Imperial Germany" page 176)
Francis
weirdpyramid said:I am confused. What is fantasy and what is regulatory? :-k
Glennj said:Am I missing something here? According to Kraus "Die Feldgraue Uniformierung" and Voigt "Deutschlands Heere bis 1918", the star as authorized on the 125th anniversary of the regiment's formation had the date "6 April 1915" on it??
Glennj said:As discussed earlier, this order does appear to explicitly authorise the adorning of the star with the date 6. April 1915
I'll second that...Very interesting but from my understanding is that among collectors/historians/authors the consensus is that it was never produced with the date on it, only the swords were added to the star. I have read also that enlisted helmets in this regiment were to get this star also attached but never has one been found to exist, only the officer version can be found.
Much appreciated if you could point me in direction of the sources from whence this consensus is derived and I shall attempt to do some more digging myself. As an aside, Kraus refers to an article by Jürgen Olmes in "Das Sponton" from 1961 which questions whether this star was actually worn.historians/authors the consensus is that it was never produced with the date on it