I think it is, but if we remove the pig latin and rhyming Cockney slang, it would only be 2 pages. It is a pretty good thread to get Tony to rethink his position.Is this a record, five pages for a thread?
Gus
I think it is, but if we remove the pig latin and rhyming Cockney slang, it would only be 2 pages. It is a pretty good thread to get Tony to rethink his position.Is this a record, five pages for a thread?
Ok OK, I can be inflexible are hard-nosed until I see some evidence. But this is certainly very interesting and as Chas said, seems to indicate that for at least this one Korps, you could buy from a BA. I woudl love to know the details, but we will never have those I am sure.Gustaf said:It is a pretty good thread to get Tony to rethink his position.
Ho, Ho, my friend! You will find neither in this topic. :evil3: For the most part, it is still on course.Gustaf said:but if we remove the pig latin and rhyming Cockney slang, it would only be 2 pages.
spikeymikey said:Anyone like 'Pink Floyd'?
Translation?????is a bit like a Zeppelin
Hey Mikey,Hey Chas how was 'Rat Patrol' tonight? Up to expectations or a bitter dissapointment?
Do you remember it, Gus? And what about 'Combat'?
Thanks for your kind comments guys. I have owned this helmet for 20 years, it has always been one of my favorites. No, there won't be any more pics because I exhausted my limited talents and patience getting these up. There is a faint circular Dresden maker's stamp dated 1912, and the size 55.5 is faintly visible in the pic where the owner's label is torn.Can we see some more external views? Any makers stamp?
I don't see why an officer couldn't purchase a less expensive, more sturdy helmet for field use.
There is a faint circular Dresden maker's stamp dated 1912, and the size 55.5 is faintly visible in the pic where the owner's label is torn.
I'll believe it when I see a period photo of one being worn. :laughing6:joerookery said:A half size issue helmet.
In a shameless attempt to stretch this topic to seven pages, I would like to revisit Tony's comment for a moment. I, for one, am inclined to agree with his point of view. However, with respect to Pickelhauben, comfort is a relative term. When I look at some of the period photographs, I get a headache from those picturing a helmet fitted so tightly it looks as though goose grease and a shoe horn were required just to accomplish the don and doffing. Furthermore, it amazes me just how clean most liners are, given the pomades and hygienic standards of the day.Tony & Kaiser said:The primary reason for buying a private purchase helmet in the first place, is comfort. After 1880 that would (usually) be a fine leather sweatband coupled by a silk skull cap.
So if comfort is the primary reason, why on earth would an officer buy a helmet with an issue pattern liner?